Creative Concepts
Invention Ideas

Economic Theories
Political Theories

Deep Thoughts
Story Ideas

New Business Ideas
Problem Solving

Political Change Without Voting

It is perhaps pleasant to think that we accomplish true change with our votes. And we all want some kind of political change. Some of us might want a return to fiscal responsibility, or a government that respects the rights of all humans. Yet many of us feel like there is no hope with the candidates we get each time there are national elections. We see the same institutionalized corruption, and if there is change it seems that it is for the worse.

Vote for the best of the choices offered, we are told. Voting for the "lesser of evils" is what this means if we truly dislike the options. Whichever candidate that is, it still means we vote for what we don't want and for policies that go against our values. Is there an alternative to this charade?

Withholding Votes for Political Change

I say just don't vote. There is no obligation to vote, and no need nor use, especially when it means nothing more than giving your assent to a government you don't want in the first place. The argument that starts, "What if nobody voted..." is just silliness and a distraction. There will always be millions of voters for every lesser-of-evils election, so we won't run out of "democracy."

So what does not voting accomplish? It doesn't do much by itself, although a non-vote is at least a vote of no confidence for the existing system, a statement of sorts. On the other hand, if you also take a few other key actions, it sets up the conditions for real change: A changing political culture.

People will vote anyhow remember, and the candidate who is closest to the views of the populace will often win the race. So rather than cast one little vote for a non-choice, why not change the minds of those who do participate. With enough new and better ideas out there, you may someday get a candidate that actually represents your interests and values.

Of course changing the political climate sounds tough, but it doesn't have to be. None of us has an obligation to spend our time and money convincing others of better ideas. But if we want to do something we can start with little steps, like buying the books of those authors who represent your convictions, and so encouraging and enabling them to write more. Good books in the bookstores can go a long way towards changing people's minds over the years.

You can also contribute to those causes that you believe in, whether that's the communist party or a green party or the Libertarian party. It makes a difference, even though we know there is no chance of a third party getting a candidate elected as president right now. What they do is bring up issues that the Democrats and Republicans then feel obligated to address. This is better than voting for candidates with bad ideas, and so encouraging bad policies. Support good ideas and you at least help drag those bad candidates in a good direction, even if it is just so they get more votes.

The complete recipe for meaningful change: Spread good ideas, support good ideas, consciously withhold support for "lesser" choices, and vote only when there is a truly good candidate. Get enough people to follow this plan and we might have more candidates worth voting for.

If you like what you see, please share...

Political Change